Articles by brentb

You are currently browsing brentb’s articles.

Biodegradable Plastics: The Green Dilemma – Part 2

June 10, 2008 in Bioresins, Injection Molding, Plastics / Resin by brentb | No comments

In Part 1, we discussed the history and sources of biodegradable and compostable plastics – what we call “green resins.” They are here; they are with us; and they come with unique challenges in both the mold building and injection processing of these resins. Most are still in the developmental stages.

Bio-resins are formulated to give end properties mimicking well known thermoplastic resins, and in some cases the processing techniques of a bio-resin emulate the conventional resin for which it is designed to mimic, but in many cases they are processed quite differently.

Most bio-resins thermally degrade quite readily. Many run at a melt temp around 350°F or less, and even if kept at the recommended melt temperature, can degrade in the barrel or a hot runner system over time. Generally, the molder wants between 50-75% of his barrel capacity for each shot, and barrel or hot runner residence time shouldn’t exceed two minutes by much.

A good processing method is to begin and end the molding with an easy flow PE resin. While the PE is going through the barrel, the heats can be lowered to the bio-resin range. The hot runner can be purged with the PE either through air shots or by running parts. When shutting down this procedure is also followed. The mold and machine, after being cleaned with Polyethylene, are shut down with the PE in them. In addition to avoiding thermally degrading the bio-resin, this technique mollifies the tendency of the bio-resins, particularly PLA, to be corrosive, especially when degraded.

A well designed hot runner system with a well placed thermocouple for each drop, as well as manifold and sprue bushing thermocouples is needed to process bio-resins successfully. The hot runner system capacity should not exceed two shots.

A well fit sliding ring-type, non-return valve and a general purpose screw with a 20:1 or 22:1 L/D ratio will nicely plasticize most any bio-resin. Shear will greatly affect most of the bio-resins, so gate size can’t be too small, and fast injection speeds should be reserved only for the thinner walled parts.

Bio-resins should be well dried prior to processing. Most should be dried to under 0.010% moisture. Either desiccant, or compressed air dryers can be used. Temps can be moderate to low when compared to many of the common thermoplastic engineering resins.

Always consult the resin maker’s guideline literature before processing any resin, especially bio-resins.

Mold construction must be tight to successfully mold bio-resins without flashing. Vents are important, and care must be taken when cutting them. The experience gained from building molds for Nylons and LCP can be applied to constructing a mold for bio-resins. Again, the resin’s corrosive nature must be taken into account when selecting steels for the injection mold. Matrix Tooling has experience in designing, constructing, and running precision injection molds for bio-resins.

Bio-resins seem to be the wave of the future, and though new and a bit delicate, can be injection molded successfully with a little knowledge, care, and common sense.

Written By:

Brent Borgerson
Senior Process Engineer (Older Molder)

Biodegradable Plastics: The Green Dilemma – Part 1

June 2, 2008 in Bioresins, Injection Molding, Plastics / Resin by brentb | No comments

“Green” is all the rage now, and a major part of the green revolution is biodegradable and bio-compostable plastic resins. Our landfills are quickly filling up and a large portion of the contents are plastic items. These items remain in their state “forever.” Incineration isn’t an option due to air pollution and grinding the plastic only reduces the size but not the volume.

This problem is a product of the disposable or throwaway society that we now live in. I can still remember families having one TV set, telephone, refrigerator, and radio per household. When these malfunctioned, they were repaired. People had one fountain or ball point pen, and they were refilled when the ink supply was depleted. Nuts, bolts and most everything else you used came from a bulk barrel and were wrapped in old newspaper or put into a brown paper bag which was then used for your lunch. There wasn’t such a thing as blister or clamshell packaging. You took your soft drink bottles back for deposit, and your empty milk bottles were picked up by the milkman. We live in a convenience-first throwaway society and plastics, particularly plastics packaging, play a big part in that convenience.

Enter biodegradable and bio-compostable plastics. With these two “green” families of plastics we can have our throwaway convenience without overfilling our waste disposal sites. There also is the advantage of deriving these plastics from renewable plant resources rather than finite resources based on crude oil and natural gas.
The earliest plastics were bio-plastics that were derived from cellulose (wood). Billiard balls were the first use. Later Henry Ford used soybean derived resins in his early automobiles. The Yo -Yo is cellulosic and most of today’s screwdriver handles are of this renewable resource, non-petroleum based plastic. This plastic won’t biodegrade though, and when disposed of becomes a permanent part of the landscape.

During the Arab oil embargo of the 1870’s, corn starch was used to extend polyethylene due to the lack of petroleum feed stocks. The resultant packaging which included milk caps and pails was functional though the resin was problematic to run. The products broke down into smaller pieces but never completely degraded as only about 25% of the product was corn starch.

My first exposure to a truly biodegradable, and in this case, bio-absorbable was at Matrix back in 2002. The resin was PLA (Polylactic acid). This was a corn based resin for a PLA encapsulated implantable radioactive “seed” for treating prostate cancer. This medical grade resin at the time of development was $1,500 per pound. Medical uses of PLA soon became a commonplace.

PLA continued to be developed, and commodity grades of the resin soon were made available allowing for prices to fall until it became a viable alternative to petrochemical resins.

Development of “green” plastics continued at a frenzied pace between 2003 and the present, and soon soy and milk (casein) based plastics reappeared and new resins came out based on the castor bean. Characteristics and properties of the new resins began to mimic the traditional resins that we are used to. Cutlery, plates, cups and clamshell packages for the fast food industry are becoming common. Writing instruments are being developed that are made from these resins, and even the pesky and environmentally ugly shopping bag as well as beverage bottles are being developed using biodegradable resins.

One developmental problem of these resins is combining the lasting properties of conventional resins with the biodegradable and compostable properties of the “green” resins. You want your pen to decompose in the landfill but not in your pocket. Your shopping bag must survive the trip home from the store; your plate or cup can’t leak all over you.

These bio-plastics, especially PLA have come under criticism though. Many people blame the rise in food costs largely on these bio plastics (and bio fuel). Defenders and makers of PLA say that they only use feed corn not consumer corn for PLA. Detractors say that the shortage of feed corn raises milk, egg, and chicken costs as well as red meat costs, and more land is diverted to feed corn for PLA and less to consumer corn.

New development in castor bean plastics makes use of this product which is poisonous to human beings. Soy based resins also take some of the pressure off of corn, though it puts the beneficial soy plant under pressure. Recent plastic resin and also fuel developed from biomass may prove the most promising development in “green” plastics and fuel. The corn kernels and soy beans can be used to feed the world’s people, directly or indirectly, and the once discarded biomass can be used to make the fuel and plastics we need to save the environment. Exciting new developments in this area are forthcoming.

At Matrix Plastic Products, we are involved in ongoing R&D projects involving “green” plastics. They require specialized mold building techniques and processing methods. It is exciting to be involved in projects that not only lessen our dependency on foreign oil, but are good for our fragile environment. I think the future will accentuate the positives and minimize the negatives of “green” plastics.

Written By:

Brent Borgerson
Senior Process Engineer (Older Molder)

Successful Mold Building: Technology or Art?

May 22, 2008 in Manufacturing Technology, Mold Making / Tool Building by brentb | 2 comments

Back in the early days of moldmaking, the product was the result more of craftsmanship than technology. A crusty old moldmaker with thick glasses, clad in a denim apron would take the project from a block of steel all the way to a finely-fit, fully-functional injection mold. The mold was his masterpiece. He took his time hand-fitting the components, and each mold, even for similar products, was often unique. Some tools took the moldmaker the better part of a year to produce.

Times have changed though, and the necessity of quick time to market and short product lives have shrunk lead time, while demanding resins and complex part geometries have dictated that robust and precise molds be built in much less time than in the past.

These shortened lead times are where technology has really stepped in to help. The crusty moldmaker has been replaced by a technologically savvy leadman, and each stage of the mold building operation is done under the control of specialized operators who are completely versed in the technology of their stage of the operation.

All steps of the mold building operation (design, steel milling, electrode cutting, wire and sinker EDM operation, turning, and grinding) are Computer Numerically Controlled and connected via a local area network. Many of these operations are palletized and robot attended, enabling lights-out operation to further reduce time to delivery of the finished mold. Direct access to 3D design models is available to every operator at every phase of operation. Time-tested standards like prints and setup worksheets are becoming a thing of the past. Even the progress of jobs and tracking records are maintained electronically.

Matrix Tooling, Inc. is now thirty years old. Having seen the mold shops of even twenty years ago, it would have been hard to imagine that today’s machining centers with their brightly colored computer displays, robotic arms, and servo motors have any relationship with the mold shops of the “old days” where craftsmanship was king.

But there’s no doubt craftsmanship still has its place. We’ve spent the last thirty years blending the best aspects of traditional mold making with state-of-the-art technology to produce a precise, top quality and robust injection mold as quickly and economically as possible. The first paragraph of the Matrix Tooling quality policy reflects this: “Matrix Tooling, Inc.’s mission is to combine traditional craftsmanship with state-of-the-art technology in designing and producing the highest quality injection tooling and molded products.”

Our team members have found the key to successful mold building and we take great pride in combining the latest technology with old-time craftsmanship into every build. Though the mold building business has evolved each team member takes the same pride in our end product as the crusty old mold maker with the denim apron.

Written by:

Brent G. Borgerson
Senior Process Engineer (Older Molder)

Have a PEEK Experience

April 24, 2008 in Engineering/Medical Grades, Injection Molding, Plastics / Resin by brentb | 3 comments

The thought of processing PEEK (polyetheretherketone) or other high-temp resins can send nervous tremors through many a molder’s body. I know, as a molder who learned the craft on a steady diet of PP and PE closures with their low melt temperatures and cold molds, my first PEEK experience made me edgy to say the least. But I’ve since come to realize that PEEK is just another thermoplastic resin and, like the others, can be molded safely and efficiently with just a few precautions.

PEEK is widely believed to be one of the highest performing thermoplastics on the market and its end properties more than justify any trials and tribulations you may encounter processing it. PEEK is a linear aromatic, semi-crystalline thermoplastic having excellent wear, chemical and hydrolysis resistance. It has very low flame/smoke toxicity and excellent electrical properties that preclude the need for additives in many cases.

PEEK processes at a high melt temperature nearing 720°F, and both the press barrel and controls must be capable of this. On many molding machines the high heat software is an option and I recommend ceramic high-temp heat bands whenever possible. A special screw and barrel are generally not needed, but consider hard units if running filled PEEK resins. We typically use sliding ring non-return valves, GP or Eliminator™ tips and don’t recommend ball checks or shutoff nozzles.

A hot mold is the key to achieving crystallinity in PEEK parts. Purging PEEK allows you to see the color change from a translucent to a solid colored crystalline state. If the mold is too “cold” (i.e. not hot enough) the parts will have that discoloration or partial translucency, and the quality of the end product will be compromised. The mold, in most cases, must be between 350°F and 450°F. This is steel temperature and requires oil or cartridge heat to maintain this level. Complex parts may require better temperature control so oil would be the preferred option. We also recommend the use of thermocouples to verify and monitor the steel temperature.

These molds must be specifically designed to run high-temp materials with draft, finish, undercuts and steel types all factored in from the beginning. Insulator plates between press platen and mold clamp plates are a must. The preferred steel type would depend on whether or not the resin uses any abrasive fillers but should have a minimum hardness of 52-54 Rc.

The resin also must be very dry to process well and achieve the desired end properties. This means that the resin must be at 0.02% moisture or below. We typically recommend drying the resin at 300°F for at least 3 hours. We also suggest the use of a moisture analyzer to assure dryness.

PEEK can be quite costly, but you should be able to use 30% dry first-pass regrind with unfilled PEEK and 10% with filled PEEK.

Safety should be a primary consideration when molding PEEK, both for purging and while working with the mold. Wear safety glasses and/or a face shield, Kevlar or Kevlar/stainless steel sleeves, and heavy cotton cloves when purging and reaching into the mold.

When preparing for your PEEK experience, research it well with your resin supplier. The above information is based on our experience, but it should used as a reference only. Also, make sure you don’t neglect recognized scientific principles when working with any thermoplastic material. With a bit of common molding sense, your PEEK experience can and should be a rewarding one.

Matrix Tooling, Inc. & Matrix Plastics Products has a great deal of mold design, building, as well as processing experience with PEEK resin, much of it in the medical field.

Posted by:

Brent G. Borgerson
Senior Process Engineer (Older Molder)

Newer entries »